As Vice President Kamala Harris steps into the fray as the frontrunner for the Democratic presidential nomination, questions arise about her potential foreign policy changes. Harris has signaled continuity with President Joe Biden's administration on several fronts, but subtle shifts could redefine America's stance globally.

In a detailed analysis of Harris' foreign policy, one can see that she is likely to uphold Biden's steadfast support for NATO and persistent backing of Ukraine against Russia. This is particularly critical, as it forms a stark contrast to former President Trump's more controversial approaches, including raising doubts about future weapons supplies to Kyiv. Harris reaffirmed US commitment to NATO's mutual defense pact, emphasizing this at the Munich Security Conference earlier this year, where she condemned Russia's invasion of Ukraine and assured an “ironclad” pledge to NATO's principles.

On the other hand, Harris' approach to Israel and the Gaza conflict may diverge notably from Biden's. Multiple articles suggest that while Harris supports Israel, she has been more vocal about the humanitarian crisis in Gaza, urging caution and expressing empathy for Palestinian civilians. In March, she criticized Israel for insufficient humanitarian efforts during its operations in Gaza, hinting at a potentially firmer stance if she were to assume the presidency.

Yet, it's not just Middle Eastern policy where Harris might differ. On China, she aligns with Biden on countering Beijing's influence, particularly in Asia. Harris filled in for Biden at a key ASEAN summit in Jakarta, where she accused China of coercive practices in the South China Sea. This reflects her commitment to confronting China when necessary, while still seeking collaborative avenues.

Harris' potential presidency could also revisit the US approach to regime change and military interventions. Surrounded by advisors who criticize the foreign policy establishment's interventionist tendencies, Harris might adopt a more cautious stance. Philip Gordon, her national security adviser, warns against the unintended consequences of regime change efforts, advocating for diplomatic engagement and selective military actions instead.

Harris' ministerial ties and family connections also shape her perspectives. Her stepdaughter has raised funds for Palestinian causes, while her husband, Doug Emhoff, being Jewish, fosters robust ties with the Jewish community and fights anti-Semitism. This personal backdrop suggests Harris might navigate Middle Eastern policies with a nuanced balance, acknowledging both Israeli security concerns and Palestinian rights.

Moreover, Harris' confrontation with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu could be her first significant foreign policy challenge. With Netanyahu's controversial stance during his US visit, Harris has a chance to assert her leadership and clarify the Democratic Party's position on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Reflecting the sentiments of many progressive Democrats, Harris could advocate for a humanitarian ceasefire and increased aid to Gaza, contrasting Biden's more centrist approach.

The upcoming electoral battle also frames these foreign policy shifts as strategic moves to win over key voter demographics who are disillusioned with Biden's handling of Gaza. Polls indicate substantial disapproval of Israeli actions among Democrats, including young voters, minorities, and independents. By articulating a balanced stance on Israel and Palestine, Harris could empower these voices, potentially gaining political leverage.

In conclusion, Kamala Harris' foreign policy approach is expected to mirror much of Biden's, particularly regarding NATO and countering China. However, her potential departure on Israel's military actions and humanitarian crisis management in Gaza, along with a cautious stance on regime change, could signal significant shifts. Harris' journey to the presidency and her handling of these critical issues will be a defining test of her diplomatic skills and political acumen, potentially reshaping America's role on the global stage.