As Donald Trump gears up for his second term as President of the United States, he intends to launch a rapid succession of executive orders designed to dismantle Biden-era policies and establish a new legislative course. The proposed executive orders cover a wide range of domains, with a particular emphasis on immigration and energy policy. Trump's aggressive and sweeping plans have been a predominant topic of discussion within the U.S. political spectrum and internationally.

Trump's planned executive actions include the reinstatement of his previous immigration strategies, such as the controversial 'Remain in Mexico' policy. This policy forces asylum seekers to wait in Mexico as their cases proceed through U.S. courts, aiming to deter the influx of illegal immigration. Trump intends to declare a national emergency at the southern border to access military funds for further enforcement measures. Other immigration-related orders aim to classify drug cartels as foreign terrorist organizations, effectively elevating the border issue to one of national security.

Energy policy is another crucial cornerstone of Trump's executive order agenda. Trump plans to declare a national energy emergency, permitting extensive offshore drilling and reviving Arctic drilling projects, reversing much of the previous administration's climate-change initiatives. The energy sector policies are projected to bolster domestic energy production jobs but have also raised significant environmental concerns amongst activists and Democratic lawmakers.

In a move to streamline the federal government, Trump's executive order strategy incorporates dismantling diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives established by President Biden. There is also intent to re-introduce 'Schedule F', a measure aimed at stripping certain employment protections from federal employees, potentially impacting tens of thousands in the federal workforce. This aspect of Trump's agenda displays a direct ambition to trim the federal bureaucracy and alter its course concerning internal administration.

The grandiosity and ambition of Trump's executive orders have not gone without blistering opposition. Legal analysts suggest that many of these actions, particularly those involving national emergencies, might face substantial legal challenges. The contentious historical reasoning stems from concerns over the overreach of executive power, which critics argue should be counter-balanced by legislative checks.

Despite the controversy, Trump's agenda reflects a strategic commentary on the use of executive power as a vehicle for rapid policy shifts without the prolonged negotiation with Congress. Trump's executive blitz is viewed as his method of fulfilling campaign promises and addressing what he perceives as urgent national issues.

Globally, there is significant scrutiny regarding Trump's executive intentions, especially with respect to the U.S. withdrawal from international climate agreements such as the Paris Accord. Nations across the world are concerned about how these shifts might influence global climate policies and international relations.

Given the disparate perspectives on Trump's array of executive orders, it will be the judicial system, legislative negotiations, and public opinion that collectively shape the possible realization of these initiatives. As Trump's presidency unfolds, each executive action will need to traverse the inherent political, legal, and societal hurdles, inevitably framing the trajectory of his second term.