Stonewall Monument: Revisiting a Controversial Change
Explore the upheaval surrounding the removal of transgender and queer references from the Stonewall National Monument's website, a decision fueled by an executive order from the Trump administration.
Published February 15, 2025 - 00:02am
![https://twt-thumbs.washtimes.com/media/image/2024/06/26/Stonewall_Anniversary_84165_c0-328-3276-2238_s1770x1032.jpg?14d8a48100f065082b285df8540f12b67e9ba76f](https://twt-thumbs.washtimes.com/media/image/2024/06/26/Stonewall_Anniversary_84165_c0-328-3276-2238_s1770x1032.jpg?14d8a48100f065082b285df8540f12b67e9ba76f)
Image recovered from washingtontimes.com
In a move that has ignited significant backlash and stirred national attention, the National Park Service has revised its Stonewall National Monument website, omitting references to 'transgender' and 'queer' individuals. The changes comply with an executive order issued by former President Trump that mandates the recognition of only two genders: male and female. This directive has caused ripples of concern and outrage among advocates for LGBTQ+ rights who view it as a stark erasure of crucial elements of their history.
The Stonewall National Monument, situated in New York's Greenwich Village, is a revered symbol of the LGBTQ+ rights movement. It marks the site of the Stonewall Riots of 1969, a pivotal event where members of the gay, lesbian, and transgender community resisted a police raid at the Stonewall Inn. This uprising galvanized the LGBTQ+ community and led to one of the initial pride parades in the United States, becoming a cornerstone in the quest for civil rights.
The recent alterations on the national monument's website have changed the narrative from LGBTQ+ to merely LGB, excising any mention of transgender and queer identities. This decision aligns with Trump's executive order and has been justified by the administration as an effort to ensure clear communication about biological sex. However, critics argue that this change distorts historical truths and undermines the sacrifices of countless individuals who have contributed to the fight for equality.
Outcry from key figures in LGBTQ+ advocacy has been swift and vehement. The Stonewall Inn, the historic location at the center of the 1969 riots, reacted strongly, posting on social media that there is no LGB without the T and condemning the Trump administration's actions as a blatant act of erasure. The bar's associated nonprofit, Stonewall Inn Gives Back Initiative, highlighted the important contributions of transgender individuals, particularly women of color like Marsha P. Johnson and Sylvia Rivera, who were instrumental in the riots.
Prominent voices such as Stacy Lentz, CEO of the Stonewall Inn Gives Back Initiative, have expressed alarm over what is viewed as an attempt to cis-wash history. Lentz has emphasized the necessity for the community to band together and defend against the erasure of transgender people from the narrative of the LGBTQ+ rights movement. Adding her voice, Angelica Christina, an advocate with the Stonewall Inn Gives Back Initiative, described the changes as deeply offensive and aligned with anti-trans rhetoric.
This decision, however, is not isolated to the National Park Service. Other federal entities, including the State Department and the CDC, have embraced the directive to alter references to LGBTQ+ by removing 'T' and 'Q' from their language. The moves have been perceived as part of a broader effort under the Trump administration to curtail recognition of non-binary gender identities, framing this as a measure to protect women from what is termed as gender extremism.
Critics of these changes draw attention to the inconsistency with scientific and social understandings of gender, as highlighted by experts from the American Medical Association and the American Psychiatric Association. These organizations affirm the perspective of gender as a spectrum, an understanding that contrasts sharply with the narrative being enforced by these federal policy changes.
The backlash against the revised Stonewall National Monument language highlights a broader cultural and political struggle over gender identity and recognition in the United States. It underscores the enduring tensions between federal directives and the efforts of LGBTQ+ advocates who continue to champion inclusivity and historical accuracy. As calls for protests and community mobilization intensify, the debate surrounding these changes remains a potent symbol of broader societal divisions and the ongoing fight for civil rights among gender and sexual minorities.