Stolen Ruby Slippers Fetch Record Auction Price

The famous ruby slippers worn by Judy Garland in The Wizard of Oz have garnered headlines once more. After intrigue and mystery, they were auctioned for an astounding $28 million.

Published December 09, 2024 - 00:12am

4 minutes read
United States
https://bloximages.newyork1.vip.townnews.com/stltoday.com/content/tncms/assets/v3/editorial/f/01/f01569b1-2dad-5cb6-b0b4-515276589613/6754d8f89093a.preview.jpg?crop=1796%2C943%2C0%2C105&resize=438%2C230&order=crop%2Cresize

Image recovered from stltoday.com

The fabled ruby slippers worn by Judy Garland in the 1939 classic film The Wizard of Oz have recently made headlines, achieving a remarkable $28 million in an auction held by Heritage Auctions. This extravagant sale price shadowed the pre-auction estimates of $3 million, defying expectations in the auction world. Their allure endures, driven by an insatiable appetite for iconic Hollywood memorabilia. Garland's slippers, one of only four surviving pairs, hold a prominent position in cinematic history, leaving audiences enchanted even decades after the film's release.

The slippers initially vanished into the annals of crime, stolen from the Judy Garland Museum in her hometown of Grand Rapids, Minnesota, in 2005. Their disappearance left a void that wasn't filled until 2018, when the FBI's persistence paid off, recovering the beloved artifacts. The audacious thief, Terry Jon Martin, revealed himself only in 2023. Aged 77, Martin, who was facing health issues, confessed to the theft, citing a desire for one last legendary heist. What he anticipated would be adorned with real jewels to justify their $1 million insured value turned out to be humble sequins and glass beads.

His confession unfolded like a scene from a crime drama. Represented by attorney Dane DeKrey, Martin was portrayed as a lifelong criminal with visions of grandeur, spurred on by an old mafia associate's tales. His error lay with the fence, Jerry Hal Saliterman, who had misled Martin about the slippers' value. Set to face trial in January, Saliterman's denial of guilt adds a further twist to this saga, reflecting the complex web of stories surrounding stolen artifacts and the underground world of theft.

Recently auctioned, the legendary slippers drew a global audience at the Dallas-based auction, a testament to their enduring appeal. Bidders from around the world engaged in a competitive battle that saw bids soaring within minutes, culminating in the record-breaking sum. This new high surpassed the $5.52 million set for a Marilyn Monroe dress, establishing the slippers as the most valuable piece of entertainment memorabilia ever sold.

Beyond their theft and recovery, the slippers hold immense cultural significance. Embedded in the narrative of The Wizard of Oz, they symbolize hope and the journey home, famously prompting Dorothy to click her heels thrice to wish herself back to Kansas. Their status has been reignited by the release of the film Wicked, stirring memories of the magical plot and its characters. Such artifacts continue to fascinate collectors and the public alike, their value more than monetary but deeply cultural.

The sale included other memorabilia from the film, such as the Wicked Witch of the West's hat, worn by Margaret Hamilton. This artifact fetched $2.93 million, underscoring a rich appetite for pieces of cinematic legacy. The story of the ruby slippers, from theft to worldwide auction, underscores the captivating allure of Hollywood's golden age treasures, which continue to inspire, provoke curiosity, and achieve unprecedented valuations.

Michael Shaw, the memorabilia collector who had loaned the slippers to the museum, stands as a central figure in their journey. His decision to share them with the public contributed to their storied past, connecting personal legacies with the larger narrative of cultural preservation. In essence, the slippers' tale underscores the interplay between desire, crime, and cultural legacy, a reminder of the stories artifacts hold beyond their physical form.

Sources

How would you rate this article?

What to read next...